Today's topic is about Porn! <--- Highlight.

Yes, finally I've come out with a entry which can be filled with substantial length to make a note of. Say, 90% out of the population or sample size, would have come across or viewed such material regardless of whatever they admit it or not. Well, those do denies such actions, would most likely rate themselves as too publically shy to announce or undoubtfully unable to accept the realistic comments.

And out of these 90% of the population who watches them, they can be further divided into 2 main categories based on my opinion. There are those leisure and frequent viewers.

Leisure viewers watch based on the availability. The availability would spark the motivation to take a sneak peak into these materials' contents. Most of the time, this is how it actually starts of, as an early adopter stage and depending on the availability of such materials, would further develop or induce the behavior, thus becoming more frequent viewers. Leisure viewers often take little interest in quality or content, but rather the excitement of the material on hand. These excitements are often short lived and neglible.

Unlike leisure viewers, frequent viewers take a more in depth approach on such contents and materials for the fact that they may pursue a several niche segment or entertainment pleasure. I've actually devised a 3-stage process in which frequent viewers take in the processing of quality materials.

1. Video Checking Stage

Well, the first stage would be "video checking". It takes into account content, quality, positions, passion, storyline, facial recognitions, dressing and other styles. Time becomes immaterial for the fact that in order to get the best quality which suits the personal desire, one would need to engage in heavy quality checking. Often these checkings would initially take 5-10 minutes per material, but in view of the learning curve effect, these checking would reduce to perhaps 1-2 minutes; with simply 8 clicks on the movie timeline.

2. Audio Checking Stage

The second stage would be "Audio checking". Well, the difference between first and second stage is basically the idea of convenience. Imagine, it would be rather stressful, tiring to engage in both audio and video at the same time. Apart from the possible prolonging of adrenaline rush, quality checking via VIDEO first, helps to narrow down the checking process, thus making the "Audio Checking" stage much easier.

The "Audio Checking" stage evidently confirms the validity and quality of the materials checked in the first stage. Some audio may irritate us and cause us to be turned off. For an example, some materials may produce sounds similar to what you experience in reality which are unpleasant. One example of that is the sound a person emits when he is having a constipation. As such, "Audio Checking" is one of the key underlying stages because it becomes the first pitstop of confirmation for the particular media or material in the hard disk.

3. Final/Transfer Stage

The final stage which is the "Final or Transfer" stage entails the idea of realistic space constraints. It also reviews the materials checked in the previous 2 stages. Notice that, a human's needs, behavior and desires are dynamic and everchanging, thus a material or media liked once before, may not contain similar positive amplitudes. For an example, Sora Aoi was good then, maybe good now, but not as good as others now too, thus she may have to get into the recycling bin.

Why is the final stage the "Transfer" stage? It's because of the idea of space limitation which causes one to look further into his portfolio and remove/update his assets, thus keeping it in sync with his dynamic desires.

Summary

Well, in conclusion, these stages are very progressive and generic. Most prefer to do stage 1 and 2 together while others do not prefer to keep a collection or evidence of their materials. However, what is really common is what people especially frequent viewers look for in these materials. They often look at the quality of content; in terms of passion, styles, storyline (maybe) and of course video dimensions.

Publication

" frostdude (2010), Total Quality Management in Porn & Other Media Materials, 1st Edition, Blogspot, Singapore "